20 Jun
2015
20 Jun
'15
9:37 p.m.
compatibility also means keeping (functionality) bugs.
Yes it does! But, anyway, the point is that I do not really see a "bug" here...
2015-06-20 15:51 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at:
On 06/20/2015 03:55 AM, Joel Matthys wrote:
I just don't see the value of trying to make it compatible with broken code in Max.
the sole purpose of cyclone is to provide compatibility with max: if you have a max(<5) patch, it makes it trivial to port it to Pd.
compatibility also means keeping (functionality) bugs.
if you don't care about compatibility, there are plenty of other externals out there, that might fit your bill.
gfdsamr IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list