Re: [PD] multiple instances of a patch forbidden in 0.49, why?

-- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Interim Assoc. Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences Creative Technologies in Music Director -- DISIS, L2Ork ICAT Senior Fellow Virginia Tech School of Performing Arts – 0141 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 ico@vt.edu liberalarts.vt.edu www.performingarts.vt.edu disis.icat.vt.edu l2ork.icat.vt.edu ico.bukvic.net On Sat, Sep 22, 2018, 17:30 Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote: > I guess the least annoying of all would be to revery back to the way it > was, and then to add an "open-unique" message to pd for anyone who wants > this behavior (apparently not many do). > > cheers > Miller > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:26:48PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:11 +0200, Christof Ressi wrote: > > > > > OTOH, I kind of agree with the others that I never thought it was a > > > problem that you can open the same patch several times... > > > > Me neither. I do think it should be allowed one way or the other. > > Having to use a flag for it (probably the least annoying option) is > > still slightly annoying. > > > > Roman > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >