well, miller now says it's not
and I actually also thought so, but then the note says differently
one way or another, we need to fix this and make it clearer in the pd documentation
Em qua, 25 de set de 2019 às 02:42, Nicolas Danet nicolas.danet@free.fr escreveu:
Good to know. Thanks.
For future readers, below a permalink as the file quickly change.
< https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/blob/7c71e91d3734d1907d6060deaf996849...
----- Mail d'origine ----- De: Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com À: Nicolas Danet nicolas.danet@free.fr Cc: Pd-List pd-list@mail.iem.at Envoyé: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:18:23 +0200 (CEST) Objet: Re: [PD] Re : Expr objects are GPL or LGPL?
hi, it's lgpl as stated in https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/blob/master/doc/1.manual/x5.htm#L199
that site is outdated
Em ter, 24 de set de 2019 às 13:19, Nicolas Danet nicolas.danet@free.fr escreveu:
Oops, link is <
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/blob/master/doc/1.manual/x5.htm#L200
.
----- Mail d'origine ----- De: Nicolas Danet nicolas.danet@free.fr À: Pd-List pd-list@mail.iem.at Envoyé: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:46:00 +0200 (CEST) Objet: [PD] Expr objects are GPL or LGPL?
Hello,
Nowadays (2019), is [expr] objects GPL or LGPL licensed?
On Shahrokh Yadegari's site it is GPL.
< http://yadegari.org/expr/expr.html >
On documentation (x5.htm) it is claimed that it is LGPL.
<
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/blob/master/doc/1.manual/x5.htm#L120
Nothing is said about it in "LICENSE.txt" whereas it wrote to refer it in the expr source files.
/* Copyright (c) IRCAM.
- For information on usage and redistribution, and for a DISCLAIMER OF
ALL
- WARRANTIES, see the file, "LICENSE.txt," in this distribution. */
I'm a bit lost.
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list