The opus could be written with a place for creativity, it depends on the musician.
I agree, the artist keeps the control, theoritically. What's happening when many artist (a grand majority in fact) cease acting this artistic 'nature '? Must the bulkys (the neo-archaic), to shout to the world that they are subjected by an injustice? They do what they want, but I think that's more interesting to incorporate this new data and try to to corrupt it by inside. Perhaps I'm wrong, we'll see.
Notice in those several verses that France the only country where we need a license, when it's time to make a public performance, just becomes expensive when it's about to dance.
Not only to dance, and a number too, for every artwork, a code bar. When this system came, first I refused it. The "DRAC" (regional cultural administration) said to me: You act in illegality! I asked them if (symbolically) they are ready to ask a license to Antonin Artaud. No answer, of course. I kept this license 3 years and I stopped this administrative joke. Interessant detail, this license resembles mysteriously a license of tobacco or alcohol seller. Art is toxic, do not misuse! But this system has a fault (not only one), like any system, I explore this fault in all illegality. What is this fault? The nature of all artwork, irreproductibility. No formatted record, no reproduction of the same opus. Like you said:
The opus could be written with a place for creativity, it depends on the musician.
And I add, the concept of every opus must exclude any possibility of reproduction. Rock-Art2noise ( a primates artwork) also answers this requirement In the facts, these "data" become for me an intriguing dogma and surely not an outdated one reactionary attitude. Each is free to act in its please. As for the donors of lessons, which they come to work in the "douce France". We have some interessant dogma for them. Au plaisir, Tad
Patrice Colet a écrit :
De: "TAD BISAHA" tadbisaha@gmail.com Cc: "PD List" pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Lundi 9 Janvier 2012 13:24:22
About production and creation, when a musician for exemple play a second time, just a second time, one of his own opus, can one still name the result a creation?
The opus could be written with a place for creativity, it depends on the musician.
In France we call that diffusion, but with this spirit, all become production, it's certainly that what they call "the cultural exception".
Notice in those several verses that France the only country where we need a license, when it's time to make a public performance, just becomes expensive when it's about to dance.