Hi Martin,
As it happens, I often use your patch chaosmonster1 as pure data benchmark. Here's why:
Amongst others I used chaosmonster1 to benchmark pd in double precision, as shown in the table halfway this page:
http://www.katjaas.nl/doubleprecision/doubleprecision.html
Another benchmark test, done last February when Raspberry Pi 2 was just out: Raspberry Pi B+ can run no more than one chaosmonster1 at default samplerate, while Raspberry Pi 2 can run five (!) instances of it, and my 1 GHz Core2Duo laptop can run eight instances.
Thanks! Katja
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM, martin brinkmann mnb@martin-brinkmann.de wrote:
does something like this exist? afaik not, but i think it would be useful to have some more or less objective and comparable method to measure how well a system is suited for running pd. there was a test patch for rjdj on the ipod/phone which consisted of simply as much osc~-objects as the device could handle. that worked quite well for checking if a patch would run on the device or not, but i think it might not cover all possible properties of a system. i wonder what such a benchmark should include: a mixture of floating point and integer computation, audio- and event calculation, filters, accessing tables, something else?
bis denn! martin
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list