hi Joe, Miller, everybody,
this reminds me of an old ``patch dependency'' theme...
So, is the idea of either Pd magically putting in a patch file (1st line) anything of the ``#N require gem zexy...'' sort, or of a Pd user explicitly putting in a patch an object [require gem zexy], simply a bad idea?
Krzysztof
Joseph A. Sarlo wrote: ...
If your patch requires an external library, you can put the .dll file in the pdvst directory and Pd should find it automatically. Oh, but I just realized that will only work for objects that have the same name as the library. I guess this is first on my TODO list for the next version.