Hey El Jay,
The best thing to do would be to break up your makefiles into patches
using either 'diff -uw' or 'svn diff' and submit them to the patch
tracker. They should be organized by library, since different people
maintain different libraries.
.hc
On Sep 24, 2009, at 6:17 PM, el jay wrote:
hello i have recently built pd -extended for debian 64 unstable(sid)
using 2.30 rt kernel-- i can give you some advises.. pd builds without anyproblem.. the
extended packages most build ok.. so of them require changing the
flags...and some packeges directly didnt build...(i guess you can
live with out them, i do :-) ) if you need help i can send you the
altered make files... one problem i had wasnt able to compile a .deb file to install..
so i had to manually install pd coping the files form the src folder
to there respective /etc and /lib folders..2009/9/24 Pierre pierre@314r.net Hi,
thanks to this script : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 !
nice :)good to hear!
Yes ! and I can tell, for now, the performances seems very good ! I mean,
really better than on my old system ! I've just tested with a patch I'm writing for an art installation (a
kind of realtime and ajustable timelapse) and I had previously some
lags (pd-extended nightly-build on hardy heron 32bit), lags which
have disappeared now ! All image are saved and played back nicely without any lags. Great !So, I must test more in depth but my first impression is very good :)
pierre
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
http://at.or.at/hans/