ok, I can create some nice sounds with biquad~ and fexpr~, but with biquad~ I still have the problem, that I cannot change the settings dynamically. otoh fexpr~ might be a solution. uhmm, andy, I do *not* (yet?) fairly understand the maths behind that. I kind of avoided biquad~ and filters, I guess it's now or never. marius.
Charles Henry wrote:
Are you talking about some kind of mass, spring, damper equation?
We could write such a thing with just a biquad~ or fexpr~, if that makes life easier. It's just a little bit of math.
Chuck
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:32 PM, marius schebella marius.schebella@gmail.com wrote:
hi, is someone working on msd? I wonder why it is not possible to change the mass of a mass dynamically with something like [setMass m1 1.5( is this function not supported because it is not possible, or just because it was not implemented yet. marius.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list