On Jul 31, 2006, at 6:04 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Jul 29, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
http://mccormick.cx/viewcvs/*checkout*/s-abstractions/s-varseq.pd http://mccormick.cx/viewcvs/*checkout*/s-abstractions/s-varseq- help.pd
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 03:52:36PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:Wow, that is really nice. I'd love to see your collection in a library included in Pd-extended.
Hey HC,
That would be really neat. I'm not trying to retain backwards compatability between CVS checkins at the moment so it's quite
unstable, but feel free to pull the whole lot from:http://mccormick.cx/viewcvs/s-abstractions.tar.gz?view=tar
Or should I check them into the SF CVS periodically?
If you want to maintain your code in a separate CVS, then you should
periodically check in releases to the SourceForge CVS. You could
also maintain your code in the pure-data CVS if you wanted to.
The goal with these is to make a set of abstractions that allow the user to have an easy to use environment for creating music with Pd; something like Reaktor under Windows, but with all the to-the-metal power of Pd that those programs lack. Also, not to have to install
lots of wacky externals to get started using Pd, so the abstractions use
only internals, except the GFX ones which use Gem and zexy. It's a long way from completion as tutorials etc. need to be written, but in the meantime the abstractions are for the most part quite useable so feel free to include them.
Sounds very good. Part of the point of Pd-extended is to make it
easy to use libraries of objects like yours. The objects in Pd-
extended will be in the same place on every platform and in each
version.
.hc