25 Feb
2013
25 Feb
'13
5:17 p.m.
Hi,
Cyrille Henry wrote:
looking at the thread, i was assuming that the question was about shmem, but it look more like a question about pix_share_write.
Yes, it was, but since I failed to find the code of shmem (now I found it on svn), I assumed it was the same thing as pix_share_* (and then forgot about the general purpose of shmem). Sorry for the confusion.
Anyway, since I want to share video frames, pix_share sounds good.
Now as IOhannes points out, v4l2loopback is certainly more standard, and probably fast enough. So maybe I'll start with this and explore the other way round if I get a bottleneck. I can output to v4l with pix_record and the v4l2 backend, that's right ?
Thanks to all, Charles