That's a good question, I am not sure. MinGW has the big advantage
that you can cross-compile from GNU/Linux or Mac OS X. I am also quite
close to getting configure.ac and makefile.in working on MinGW, so that
means one build system for all platforms. (I have Pd compiling with
configure.ac and makefile.in, but the portaudio stuff doesn't work
yet).
MSVC is most likely a fair amount better at optimizing for Windows.
Anyone have any test patches for this?
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
Quick question - how does mingw compare with MSVC in terms of run-time efficiency? If it's comparable I should switch over...
cheers Miller
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:41:17AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
http://at.or.at/hans/pd/installers.html
This is a big Windows release, and a bugfix release for GNU/Linux and Mac OS X.
What's new:
- The Windows release is now compiled with MinGW and has all of the
same patches to the core as the other two.
- Preliminary international character support. It seems to work fine
in comments, not yet in objects and messages.
.hc
__ ____
News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is publicity. - Bill Moyers
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is
publicity.
- Bill Moyers