On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Christian Klippel wrote:
Am Freitag 09 Dezember 2005 02:55 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard: [...snip...]
compare: [jit.op @op +] vs [# +]
also, didnt the early incarnations of gridflow also use the @ sign?
Yeah, but with a different meaning.
GridFlow's @ was "at" as in "array", as in Perl, but it was used as a prefix for grid-processing class names instead of as prefix of variables of array type.
Jitter's @ is "at" as in "attribute", as in Ruby, but it's used as keyword-arguments instead of as prefix of variables of instance scope.
Jitter's equivalent of GridFlow's "@" and "#" in classnames is the "jit." prefix (but not exactly so)
Jitter's equivalent of GridFlow's "#" inside lists is... inexistent (?)
GridFlow's equivalent of Jitter's "@" is "," where applicable.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada