if you send "0" to the first inlet (the one with the gemlist) of a pix_fx, it will be turned off. sending it "1", turns it - suprisingly - on.
but this way you cannot add fx dynamically.
So, every [pix_*] object behave like this ?
Does it save on CPU+RAM performance when it is set to 0 ? Otherwise, would [spygot] be more suitable ? For instance, does change the gemlist path with spygot create new instances of the gemlist "object" every time one changes the flow ?
aalex