On Apr 13, 2005, at 8:22 AM, ydegoyon@free.fr wrote:
the point is, if you submit code without having testing it on linux, it's a nonono..... lack of respect for real workers.
...Really, this is just farcical that you imagine that all changes checked in are to be tested so widely..
no!!! it's not.
...yeh, good dialogue there: point/counterpoint, I like...it's generally understood that cvs head (or as some people say, "top of tree") is potentially unstable...it's a simple matter to regress to the previous version, and I think you miss the point of collaboration; that is, "people working together on a single project"...
i asked you _many_ times to send me your code so that i can check it myself AND YOU NEVER DID...
...oh, I did send you the code, and I assumed that you had looked at it when you gave IOhannes the ok (when you were recently in graz) to give me cvs access...but I guess that assumption was way wrong, oh well...
sorry, i might loose some bits of memory, but you just sent me a link to you site without much explanation and _not_ the right gem to make it work or test it.
...yeh, I didn't send you a patched version of pd for osx either...I did mention that you needed the cvs head for gem...
it's also true i was quite busy and didn't have much time to dig into it. ( don't forget FADAIAT 2 : http://www.fadaiat.net )
...wow, never heard of it, so how would I remember it? And please don't expect that I have any more time to fool with this/you: I suspect that all the developers on pd are "quite busy"...
barking avoid you to bite.
...more like a flamethrower: napalm keeps things from growing.
i'm _not_ sorry,
...well, you already did just above, but with your demeanor, it's not expected: if you can't admit you just fly off the handle, you'll just keep repeating the same tired behaviors and further alienate yourself from people who tried to collaborate...
but best,
...sure (starts working on other fruitful collaborations)
james