Hey Pat,
I have not tried getting PDP or gridflow working on my g4 yet, I especially like how these three packages can work together. Right now there is a lot of functional overlap and I would guess a lot of duplicate efforts.
I just wanted to throw this out, even if I'm not a gem/pdp/gridflow developer.
For example video tracking, All three packages allow this functionality, all include objects to do so and some examples. (is there a Gem example? If not I have a nice simple one I can contribute.) For the Open Territories project (of which pixelTANGO is part) if the grant is a success we will be developing more streaming stuff and this would be great if it would fit in well into all three packages.
So the question is how to make the packages less redundant, how to play off the strengths of one and other...
Gem
performance.
industry features (shaders, gfx assembly, clusters, stereo etc..)
for it?
PDP/PiDiP
Gridflow
patcher (not external developer) to create tracking systems.
low-level pixel by pixel access)
So how could these things weave together in the future? I see a couple of possiblities:
this a reality) How does the streaming stuff fit in? You could use the PiDiP streaming stuff to stream a texture, but I think we are a ways away from streaming the Gem buffer.
iemmatrix? and certainly some interesting low-level mathematical control of vertex-arrays. There are probably a few other things in Gem-land that could use something like gridflow as well.
Anyhow I realized this at pixelACHE and thought I would through it out. I think it makes little sense for someone to develop a IP streaming system that whose code cannot be used in Gem or gridlow. This is a big part of the piksel interoperability project @ bek.
Anyhow I'd love to hear some ideas about this issue.
B>
Patrick Pagano wrote:
Well i just have to say that without jamie, i would not even be able to comment, BUT.... big BUTT.
that was the most excitement i have had with the computer in a while
the examples are cool and i will gladly offer help to the next person as Jamie helped me
I think getting help, compiling it yourself makes you appreciate it so much more :-) after it works of course...lol
brought me back to ye Olde JMax days
GEM/pdp/gridflow .....Nice
On Apr 28, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Apr 27, 2005, at 6:52 PM, james tittle wrote:
On Apr 27, 2005, at 6:02 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What's wrong with the ruby that's included with Mac OS X? At the very least, if a pre-compiled version of gridflow was included in the Pd.app, all the user would have to do is install Ruby.
The problem with the Ruby in OSX 10.2 is that it's just an application, that is, it's missing both libruby.a and libruby.dylib, and so gridflow.pd_darwin cannot embed the Ruby interpreter within PureData.
In OSX 10.3 and 10.4, the situation may be different, but I don't recall what it is. Anyhow, I think I recall that one has to install XCode to get Ruby, right? Does Pd.app already require XCode? I only have OSX 10.2 so someone else will have to look into it.
,-o---------o---------o---------o-. ,---. | | The Diagram is the Program (TM) | | ,-o-------------o--------------o-.
-o--------------o--------------o-' | | Mathieu Bouchard (Montréal QC) | | téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
---' `-o-- http://artengine.ca/matju -'_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-listPatrick Pagano, B.S.,M.F.A Candidate Research And Development Assistant Digital Worlds Institute University Of Florida (352) 294-2070
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list