7 Jun
2005
7 Jun
'05
9:42 a.m.
rainer _ wrote:
btw, what do you people need the "buffer 1" feature for ? i thought of removing it a la long and "replace" it with some controllable feedback in double-buffered >>mode. (this means: if single-buffered mode is used only to not make "traces" of objects, this could be >>handled otherwise.) if someone needs full control over the render-chain, removing would probably be a bad idea.
i would hardly wish not to remove it -
hardly or hard ?
i use single bufferd mode a lot in my pixel/video processing patches. for me definitly a feature. please dont remove it !!!
again, the question is, what for did you need it exactly ? what feature of the single-buffer do you need ?
mfg.a.sdr IOhannes