since it is easy to change, I did not care so much about the structure. I just pasted the basic information. there should be only one "tags" field, but sometimes I got a second or a third. for example pdmtl abstractions had "flags", which I am not exactly sure, what they are for, but I kept them. for the categories, I think I do not want to structure the wiki in categories, because the categories are too vague, but still, chosing from given categories is a good idea, but I also think some objects belong to more than one category. I you have ideas for categories, you are welcome to post. atm this is kraut und rüben (pell-mell). marius.
Georg Holzmann wrote:
Hallo Marius!
Only some small questions: for what are the "TAGS","TAGS","TAGS" ? (in your csv file no object uses them)
"OBJECTNAME","ABBREVIATION","DESCRIPTION","LIBRARY","CATEGORY","TAGS","TAGS","TAGS","HELP PATCH"
And to the categories: do you want to list objects per category afterwards, which would meen that we should choose between a fixed set of categories ?
Maybe we could just post more objects here in the list and then you could add the - although this migth not be optimal ... ;)
LG Georg