On Jun 2, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Steffen Juul wrote:
On 02/06/2008, at 9.48, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
finally i have decided to release Gem-0.91 codename 'tigital'.
Cool, thanks.
I just made (with bash+) a pd-patch that instantiate all the object- classes that have a help-patch in the Gem folder. It's attached in
case others might find it useful for testing or just for the
overview or something else.
Looks useful. That reminds me of my small effort along these lines:
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/scripts/ load_every_help.sh http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/scripts/ load_every_object.sh
I like to set these up to run every night, but I don't think I can
handle the extra load of fixing the broken help files in finds on top
what I am already trying to manage. So I want to know if anyone is
interested in following up on whenever this script finds a missing
help file. Basically, it would entail just checking why it failed.
It could be a help file that causes a crash or a missing helpfile.
In the case of a missing help file, for example, it would just be a
matter of making a helpfile and submitting it to the patch tracker
(or committing it if you have commit access).
.hc
Best
<gem_obj_list.pd>_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!