Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
reST seems quite nifty for quickly banging out simple documents, but how does it hold up when do thing more complex things? Yes, SGML/XML is a pain, but once you have your docs in that format, you can do just about anything with it in terms of formatting or even machine parsing.
reST can be extended by writing directives as the ".. image::"-directive. But you're right, it is made for quick editing with minimal markup. In this regard, it is very similar to Wiki-Web markup. But apart from the html- and tex-generators there also is a generator for XML, so reST even can function as a source for that. In the end it's just a matter of taste. reST also is a good utility for converting existing text documents into html.
I like that CSS by the way. I edited the pd docs in the CVS to use a CSS, so you can make them look the same.
The default.css in the tutorial is just the standard reST-CSS attached at the end of the standard pure-data.sf.net-CSS. That's the nice thing about *Cascading* style sheets. ;)
ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__