guenter geiger wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Marc Boon wrote:
These two points clearly illustrate the need for namespaces in Pd.
I don't agree. I think the solution would be to have only one wrap.
i think that there is no possibility to acchieve this, as we can easily see if we have a look at the archives. this problem has been discussed for several years now. quoting Krzysztof:
So, I really do not know, if this is going to be a real step forward, or just a fuel keeping this thread alive for some more time?
this has been in august 2002 !! note the resignation on the length of the thread.
pd itself can easily be kept simple and orthogonal without nameclashes. i don't believe that externals/libraries can.
But I give up
me too.
i have checked it in
mfg.as.dr IOhannes