On 3/12/2019 6:11 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
TL:DR: better use a modular JACK (freewheel) approach compared to more 'static' Pd as a plugin approach.
For more than a decade I've been totally happy with pdvst~. Having the ability to integrate Pd to a DAW channel has been totally productive to my music. Also integration of automation parameters from the DAW to the patch is very valuable.
I guess is totally possible to do a pdladspa~ (or any other open source audio plug-in protocol). As far as I know Pdvst~ is just Pd running an "external scheduler".
Is not that I have anything against your "JACK (freewheel)" approach, just sharing some thought.
:)
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.