On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 16:07 -0500, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
You can submit edited patches to the bug tracker on the sourceforge page [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=55736&atid=478070 direct link].
I am now wondering something: why haven't these awesomely functional netpd object been included as abstractions within Pd-extended?!?!
because nobody included them yet. ;-)
Seriously, they are the most functional and useable get-started-out-of-box things to represent Pd around, and they are not in Pd-extended!
the question is: how should they be included? should they be included as they are now, with the gui and their dependency on the netpd-framework? or would it make more sense to strip everything off to get a working subset of abstractions, that can be used in a more flexible way? as far as i understand the concept of pd-extended as a collection of abstractions and externals (read: collection of tools/utility rather than a collection of examples), i'd vote for the latter, though that would involve a lot more work.
i'd rather do not include the abstractions/patches myself and i'd rather do not make the decision on how they should be included. but i'd be willing to deliver stripped off abstractions with helpfiles from my own netpd-patches, so someone else could could include/organize them in pd-extended.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de