On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 07:12:05PM +0000, ix@replic.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:02:33PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
hi
me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons. now i found out that it has been dropped from zexy. is there a reason to drop an object when it's already introduced? i mean, it's _not_ that difficult to change the patches, so it's not a big deal, but i think [nop] didn't "disturb" the library, or did it?
sorry, i dont know what im talking about, i agree, taking features out is bad, you never know who uses them. at least you can sed -i -e "s/nop/t a/" *.pd or something...
if you have a recent pd (>=0.38) , any connections to your 'nop' object will not be disturbed, this new feature is probably why nop was dropped in the first place..
cheers roman
___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list