Is there a problem with this? I remember a discussion about it a while ago, but I don't think there was ever a conclusion.
m.
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Lavallée [mailto:odradek@videotron.ca] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:20 PM To: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Subject: Re: [PD] PD n00b: counter kludge
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Le 23 Juillet 2003 14:11, Matthew Allen a écrit :
They both do the same thing, I think the second one is a little cleaner and easier to read/figure out what is going on.
Of course I don't agree, since I prefer my patch... One problem with Frank's patch: the f object is indefinitely incremented.
Marc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Ht/SQdzoeKQ0PccRAgknAKC+SM8N8qI0QiFEEw4awX7MCSkAKgCcCsB6 u2ElADPZOaVniwqO1foJTug= =2St8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
Scanned on 23 Jul 2003 19:37:18 Scanning by http://erado.com