Scott i am a mild end-user person who has GEM/pd and all the externals working on WinXP Home, Linux Redhat 7.3, MacOSX and a baby gem 0.84 on Irix 6.3 working fine.
Do you want to use the tool sor make the tools. This is a concern you must address. There are no simple installs with this type of software because it seems to be in constant flux.
good luck
let me know if i can help
PAt
-----Original Message----- From: pd-list-admin@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-admin@iem.at]On Behalf Of J. Scott Hildebrand Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 8:19 PM To: PD-list@iem.at Subject: [PD] Pd and GEM installation woes
i consider myself pretty technically able. i've only started VC++ in
windows so that's new territory for me, but i have a few years experience in linux programming, just school stuff though (nothing very deep).
getting GEM to work in either platform has been fucking hell. i
realize it's a good idea to have every extention to Pd made available separately, but if I CAN'T GET THIS SHIT TO WORK, you can sure as hell believe that casual users won't be able to. i think this is all good software but it's just too hard to set up. i believe this stuff can go really far and its user base can get bigger and bigger, but there needs to be some ease-of-installation improvements.
for windows how about having an EXE file that installs everything
like a typical program would? i'm talking about Pd, GEM, all the extentions like GrIPD, IEMLIB, GGEE, and ZEXY. still make the individual parts available to install the old way as well... for purposes unknown and the obvious one of portability; if you want to run pd on a PDA or something and definitely don't need other useless stuff.
for macOS have a same sort of EXE and do the same stuff in linux via
the typical .compile and .configure stuff. good idea???? YES!!! do it! i would except i don't know how.
your friendly but irritated visionary,
scott
"640K ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates, 1981
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list