On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 18:06 +0000, José Rafael Subía Valdez wrote:
Thank you Lucas and Ingo,
well. I do need to load a lot of samples if I want them preloaded. Regarding the ram post that you sent, as I understand, that is exactly what table does, as it stores it in RAM (am I right?)
Ingo, if I understand correclty, I need to record the audio from readsf~ into a table. this means that I need to create the record system to avoid clicks (fades in and out). This seams overcomplicated for a simple thing. But it appears to be the only solution for this problem.
thanks .. anyone else?
I missed Ingo's mail and it's apparently also not in the list archive. Probably he responded privately.
Anyway, Miller proposed once a solution with [readsf~], too. The idea was to put it into a re-blocked and upsampled subpatch, so that it would read the file much quicker than real time, but slow enough not to cause dropouts. It's a bit more complicated to program than simply sending a message to [soundfiler], but still easy to do. And you need to figure out what is a good upsampling ratio.
Roman