The thing I'm really afraid of is:
Do subpatches with several [phasor~] used as a audiosignals produce a different result as intended without summing up in total over "1". Especially as in my cases where I'm using lots of [phasor~] mostly for amplitude modulation and most of the time they are not turned down in level.
Ingo
Von: pd-list-bounces@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Ingo Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. November 2010 10:42 An: pd-list@iem.at Betreff: [PD] Strange behavior between [phasor~] and [creb/blosc~]
Hi everybody,
I just noticed a very strange behaviour concerning [phasor~].
It started when I wanted to replace [phasor~] with [creb/blosc~]. Normally they should sound pretty much the same except for the obvious aliasing problem of [phaser~]. Then I noticed that in some cases they didnt sound the same and in others they did. I finally found out that it had to do with the level going over 1 - only while being doubled.
While [creb/blosc~] sounds the same no matter if I boost the levels higher than 1 [phasor~] starts to cancle its sound. With a single [phasor~] its no problem but two of them will give you trouble. Since Pd is working with 32 bit float this shouldnt really happen and doesnt with [creb/blosc~].
Can anybody explain this? I have my test patch attached.
Ingo