13 Nov
2009
13 Nov
'09
12:37 a.m.
Hallo, Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
I've been using this a lot recently as well, but I don't think, Miller's undocumented suggestion can replace this in all cases. One advantage of the bang~->switch~ approach is - I believe - that it gets rid of many function
I meant to write "[bang~]->[0(->[switch~]" here.
Ciao
Frank