27 May
2005
27 May
'05
4:55 p.m.
Thomas Grill wrote:
Ah, and you said you couldn't figure out how my oggamp~ was working so you made your own one.... another fork? :-)
Oh, true, i remember now - it's not a fork but a new implementation. That's because it was contract work and it was faster to write it from scratch than debug the existing code. I think, WInfried asked me if we should put it on SF - it seems that hasn't happened yet. Well - i had difficulties finding an unambiguous name.
it is already in the CVS under externals/iem/iemstream.
i think it still has the old (imo: bad) name "amp~" and i am not sure, whether the build process works (this is: whether it really builds an "amp~.pd_linux" or a "iemstream~.pd_linux"....)
mfg.asd.r IOhannes