Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:
I thought of doing that, but reconsidered because it seems like it might lead to versioning problems, namespace clashes, multiple copies of objects and possibly, dogs and cats sleeping together.
I've found an easier solution: add [declare -path .] to polyWaveSynth.pd.
That requires > 40.0, right? Also, there doesn't seem to be a help patch for [declare] -- I've seen it mentioned here on the list, but is it documented anywhere? It looks like it would add [polyWaveSynth]s folder to PD's path -- but how would PD find [polyWaveSynth] to load it in the first place?
Plus, does this really avoid any problems from including dependent objects (possibly creating multiple copies) inside abstraction folders?
Or was it PolyWaveSynth.pd? PolyWavesynth.pd? I think all lowercase names are easier to remember <hint,hint>. ;)
i'llconsiderthatforthenextrelease. :-)
Phil