Fred Jan, are you the author of Freeverb?
I have built a "ducking reverb". It's a lot of fun to play with. I basically send note-on, note-off events and modulate the "wet" parameter, with a large room size.
Eg., a note-on will trigger Wet to go to Attack_Val (Usually a low Wet setting) in Attack_ms time.
Then a note-off will trigger sending Wet to Release_Val (Usually a larger Wet setting) in Release_ms time.
The only problem is, the message changes occur at control-rate, so I'm getting clicking.
My question is, is there any advantage or difference in doing my Wet/Dry mixing internal to [Freeverb~]?
...as opposed setting freeverb to 0% dry and 100% wet and mixing externally?
Of course I can get signal-rate mixing by using [line~] if I do this externally.
Thanks, BH
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Fred Jan Kraan fjkraan@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi All,
I just completed the upload of an updated version 1.2.2 of freeverb~ to puredata.info, and it is available via deken for the usual platforms.
This version of Freeverb~ has three enhancements:
- placed the fix_denorm_nan_float() function is the signal path,
- added an alternate output that is closer to reality (in theory anyway),
- restyled the help patch and fixed the missing wav file.
The github repository is at https://github.com/electrickery/pd-freeverb.
I am looking forward to any comments regarding the alternate output feature.
Greetings & have fun,
Fred Jan
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list