Il 09/08/10 12.17, Marco Donnarumma ha scritto:
Hi all, it's been a week now I'm struggling to record properly a GEM output, reading archives and forums.
I have fairly complex audiovisual patch with multiple geos, four pix_snaps to create motion blur effect for 1280x320 res, and data exchange through local network. However I can record in a really good quality using both pix_record or pix_write.
The problem is the recorded video is faster than the actual one. It doesn't matter if I record frames with pix_write and build a movie with ffmpeg or I record a whole movie with pix_record, the resulting movie is faster anyway. (I can confirm it 100% as I also record audio at the same time, and it is indeed longer)
This happens on a machine with ATI card, both in ubuntu jaunty and windows with Pd-ext 42.5 rc 5.
What is even weirder is that if I load the recorded video into Pd with pix_film it tells me the video has 115 fps, but with any other software fps is between 20 and 30 (which I assume should be the proper framerate).
Anybody experienced the same? What could I do about it?
Hi, I only have experience with pix_write oby (it generate tif/png/jpeg image sequence) and it write at framerate specified on the gemwin oby. If you have [gemwin 50] you have 50 frame per second image sequnce, if you set [gemwin 25] you have 25 .....