hi,
read the next sentence in the quote carefully:
i wouldnt say that hardware cant be modified.
wouldnt != would ;-)
this is because you have never see free hardware.
woot? not only i have seen it, i actually do it: http://multio.mamalala.de to give only one example ..... be carefull what you wish for .... ;-)
sorry.i made a mistake here. so, i don't undestand you : why do you say hardware can't be modified, as that what you're doing?
see above, i said i _wouldnt_ (which is: would not) say that ;-) the whole stuff i wrote after that sentence wouldnt (!) make any sense if i had agreed with the previous poster that hardware couldnt (!) be modified.
but no problem, misunderstandings happen on an international level, where each one speaks a language that isnt native to her/him.... once i thought "invaluable" means "of no value" when someone wrotes something about my stuff. sure i was upset, but as it turned out, i was wrong ;-)
[...snip...]
i don't have bookmark anymore about this, (as i was working on this many years ago) but i've got a lots of shematics that i'll send you off list.
that would be very nice!
cyrille
greetings,
chris