In Pd-extended 0.41.4, just load it like this: [mrpeach/binfile].
Its included.
.hc
On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:49 PM, Jerome Covington wrote:
Done, I the file named binfile.pd_darwin in the PD app package in
the directory path you provided. Should I name the file something
else? I'm on an Intel Mac. Still no audio though I can see in the
log window that messages are being sent when I use your binDATApayer
program.On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:33 PM, alan.dubdub@googlemail.com wrote: Im on a mac so everything is hidden inside the app package, which is
a folder really. I go to application> right click/ ctrl click on the file and select
"show content" then put the binary in contents/resources/extraIf you on linux it should be work the same (being Unix and all) but
not sure about windows i am afraidDoes anyone have any suggestions to get binfile.pd working on
windows / linux??marius.
On 13 Oct 2009 02:21, Jerome Covington <info@thespacebetweenthewords.org
wrote: I can't seem to find this directory.
~/pd/contents/resources/extra
Should I create that directory structure myself? And if so where
does it go?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:54 PM, alan brooker alan.dubdub@googlemail.com wrote:
darn! I think it may have something to do with the binfile.pd
which is
an external from Mr.Peaches-for some reason the binary doesn't get
found by PD- I attach a copy for OSX- if you add it to
~/pd/contents/resources/extra (don't put in in the the mrpeach
folder
because cant find it). I m not too sure where binaries are for other
os
Basically If the binfile gets working it is a good way to make sound
based on computer data, as opposed to just playing the raw file of a
jpeg -thank for looking :)
On 10/12/09, Jerome Covington info@thespacebetweenthewords.org>
wrote:
Hey, I can get the visualization to work, but not the
"audioization".
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:53 PM, The Space Between the Words info@thespacebetweenthewords.org> wrote:
Thanks, Alan!
I will take a look at your binary conversion patch first chance
I get.
Regards,
Jerome
On Oct 11, 2009, at 7:40 PM, alan brooker alan.dubdub@googlemail.com
wrote:
it's better if you can recognise the stock price in the music,
because if you can't, you could have taken that data from
anywhere
else and it wouldn't matter, so why would you call it
stockmarket
music then?...
I agree fully- the point in which the output is true to it's
source
and making something sound good is tricky and down to skill-
I worked on a simple patch that created audio from binary data
from
loaded files and I am trying to make good sounds from the
patch in
different ways continually- half the fun though!(a work in
progress!
contains osx app and pd patch for other os- uses Mr.Peaches
binfile):
http://databodega.googlecode.com/files/bin_data_application.macosx%20.zip
On 10/11/09, Jerome Covington
info@thespacebetweenthewords.org> wrote:
Excellent, Mathieu.
I have a lifetime of experience in music to inform the
aesthetics well.
Now I just need more on the "how", and to that extent I am very
interested
in process within this community.
--
Regards,
Jerome Covington
. . . . : . . . . :
"define audio development"
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca
>wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Jerome Covington wrote:
>
> Is anyone interested in sharing their process for turning
real-time,
>
>> non-audio data feeds, into music? See a great example of
one possible
>> direction, here.
>>
>>
> Coïncidentally, I wrote some thoughts about it in the Pd
chatroom a few
> hours before your email, because of a similar topic there:
>
> «
>
> musical meaningfulness comes from meaningfulness of the data
> beforehand...
> basically, if you put garbage in, you get garbage out.
>
> the exception to that is that a programme is a kind of data
in itself,
> so
> the programme can be considered a kind of meaningful
input... and if
> the
> programme imposes itself as the source of the meaning and
successfully
> downplays the incoming garbage, it can make the output
meaningful;
>
> but unless one is very skilled at understanding the
information theory
> standpoint of music, using random values gives you just more
> meaningless
> music like what you are talking about... sort of like
picking a random
> book
> from the library of babel.
>
> »
>
>
>>
>>
> now this is what I add to my above thoughts, this time in
relationship
> to
> the video: without necessarily explicitly thinking about
information
> theory,
> one can get to interesting results intuitively... one
essentially has
> to
> focus on getting beautiful results for likely inputs instead
of being
> content with whatever fits with the description of a certain
art
> concept.
> Any former stock-market music I had listened to sounded like
crap. What
> Patrick did was to make his programme insert so much beauty
and
> coherence
> in
> the market's noise, that it made it sound meaningful...
actually, it's
> more
> like this: the programme can only output music that sounds
reasonably
> good
> no matter the input, and the meaningless input selects one
of the
> possible
> nice-sounding outputs. Overall, the music is more shaped by
Patrick's
> æsthetic decisions than by the stock market, and it's
perfect like
> that.
>
> so, Jérôme, I would mostly just suggest that you make
patches so that
> the
> results sound fairly good no matter the input you give them,
and
> optionally,
> if you can make the input also recognisable in the output,
it's a bonus
> feature that can feel very rewarding, but it depends on the
context...
> for
> feeding stockmarket data it may not matter as much, but for
live
> interactive
> data from performers or visitors, they have to recognise
their own
> impact
> on
> the music, else the point is going to be lost on them,
really. but even
> for
> stockmarket data, it's better if you can recognise the stock
price in
> the
> music, because if you can't, you could have taken that data
from
> anywhere
> else and it wouldn't matter, so why would you call it
stockmarket music
> then?...
>
> so maybe you wanted people to explain their actual
processes, but I
> hope
> that you will also enjoy this reflexion on the question of
what might
> make
> processes be good or not.
>
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________
_____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone:
+1.514.383.3801
>
--
Regards,
Jerome Covington
. . . . : . . . . :
"define audio development"
-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"
-- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development" _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. - David Zicarelli