29 Oct
2003
29 Oct
'03
3:49 p.m.
well, i just said i wouldn't make the effort, of course, it would be welcome if someone would ...
As much as i know of PDP is that there is a generic part (a data processing kernel), matrix transformation stuff and more system-specific io and library depending parts. The first two parts should be quite easily portable, shouldn't they? Maybe Tom can comment on it. For my part (for VASP) i'm only interested in these... the more platform-specific things could follow later. By reading the developer docs i see that there are plans for a PD independent library and a PD interface... that would be exactly what i need and what would be required for a good Windows port.
best greetings, Thomas