3 Nov
2010
3 Nov
'10
4:48 p.m.
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 14:46 +0000, Jamie Bullock a écrit :
Hi all,
This is more of philosophical question than anything else. I'm curious to know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd. Why not have implicit control -> signal conversion everywhere it is possible?
For example why not allow this?
|2( |3( | | [+~ ]
I think this is the same than : [2 ( [3 ( | | [sig~] [sig~] \ / \ / [+~] The messages are send every 64 samples (if i am right ?) So, in this exemple, if you send it to [sig~] or [+~], this should be the same thing. ++
Jack
Jamie
-- http://www.jamiebullock.com
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list