8 May
2018
8 May
'18
11:05 p.m.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com wrote:
... I personally cannot think of any use case where someone relies on pow(-1, 2) generating "0", it just seems wrong to me (i.e. a bug) and allowing it to do that wouldn't break things.
Maybe add another outlet for the imaginary part?
Martin