8 Feb
2005
8 Feb
'05
7:11 p.m.
Hi Krzysztof,
Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
the problem is block-wise handling of 'start' by readsf~, which could (should?) be changed. The delay's output is correctly time-stamped.
This could be the explanation why delay works exactly in all other cases. I've always tested the combination of delay and readsf~ - see my test-patch. In this patch, setting delay to 9.333333ms causes a delay of 8ms, until you set it to 9.334ms :-(
And that's my current solution: add 0.001ms to every delay. Thus, I send 8.001ms for 6 blocks and 9.334 for 7 blocks delay (SR=48kHz). Not very elegant solution, but it works for me (with some limitations).
Thanx,
Piotr
--
Piotr Majdak
Institut für Schallforschung
Ãsterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften
Reichsratsstr. 17
A-1010 Wien
Tel.: +43-1-4277-29511
Fax: +43-1-4277-9296
E-Mail: piotr@majdak.com
WWW: http://www.kfs.oeaw.ac.at