is that something a "normal user" like me (someone that only uses the surface of the software) can do, or it has to do with C or any other custom compiled/prepared versions?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 01:06, Christof Ressi info@christofressi.com wrote:
You can attach GDB to a running or even a not-yet-running application. When that application crashes, you get a backtrace. That's how I found the crash in the [pd~] subprocess.
Personally, I use Qt Creator because it has a nice graphical front-end for GDB where I can easily step through functions while looking at the code, watch local variables, etc.
Christof
On 17.11.2021 00:49, Miller Puckette via Pd-list wrote:
If by any chance you're using pd 0.52 (test version) then I think it can crash when used as a subprocess (this should be fixed for the next test release). If you're using Pd 0.51-4 the problem is something else.
The "broken pipe" message means the subprocess died suddenly for some
reason.
But I can't think of an easy way to figure out what killed it.
cheers Miller
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 08:45:28PM +0100, João Pais wrote:
Hello list,
I have a max patch with pd inside through the pd~ object. But I'm
getting
the "broken pipe" error in some cases in a mac, such as:
in a compiled standalone it usually works
in the original patch it doesn't
both patches were made in the same system, with the latest pdmax and
pd
versions were used. I'm not sure anymore which max version or macos
system
was used to compile the standalone, if that's important (it was either
max 7
or 8).
I don't have access to a mac myself, but the system where it was tested
was
a 11.6, with Max 8. It seems to me that in some systems it works, and in other it doesn't - but I don't have enough hard data to prove it.
Best,
Joao
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.puredata.info_lis...
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list