Re: [PD] cartopol~ and poltocar~

-- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Associate Professor Computer Music ICAT Senior Fellow Director -- DISIS, L2Ork Virginia Tech School of Performing Arts – 0141 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 ico@vt.edu www.performingarts.vt.edu disis.icat.vt.edu l2ork.icat.vt.edu Ico.bukvic.net On Oct 16, 2015 11:48 PM, "Ivica Bukvic" ico@vt.edu wrote: > I am sure this has been covered on this list before--if it is not too much > of a trouble where can one get the new version of cyclone? > > Also, there are some improvements on pd-l2ork side of things that I've > implemented that may detract from Max behavior but also offers other > benefits. For instance, coll object can be threaded and as such allows > loading of large files without dropping samples, albeit at the expense of > determinacy, so one in these cases must rely on outputting done loading > bang signal before working with the cool object. This option is fully > backwards compatible and the default behavior is non-threaded. It would be > great if we could have those merged so that we don't have to maintain two > separate versions of the cyclone library. > > Best, > > -- > Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. > Associate Professor > Computer Music > ICAT Senior Fellow > Director -- DISIS, L2Ork > Virginia Tech > School of Performing Arts – 0141 > Blacksburg, VA 24061 > (540) 231-6139 > ico@vt.edu > www.performingarts.vt.edu > disis.icat.vt.edu > l2ork.icat.vt.edu > Ico.bukvic.net > this has been corrected in the new cyclone library > > actually, both cartopol~ and poltocar~ were "wrong" in the same way, but > for extended 0.42 only poltocar~ was corrected, this incomplete fix ended > up ruining spectral processing that was actually working before that. > > get the new cyclone, many objects are being corrected > > cheers > > 2015-10-16 18:14 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Agostinho via Pd-list < > pd-list@lists.iem.at>: > >> Just a little update: the problem is with [cartopol~], its rightmost >> outlet is outputting the correct value multiplied by -1. >> >> >> On 16/10/15 22:55, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I believe I found a bug with the objects [cartopol~] and [poltocar~]. >>> Basically, if I would connect both outlets of [cartopol~] to the inlets of >>> [poltocar~], I would expect to receive the same values as I would input. >>> The problem is that the output of the second outlet of [poltocar~] is >>> multiplied by -1! I tested this with both Pd 0.46.5 and pd-extended 0.43.4 >>> (and this bug isn't present in Pd-l2Ork). >>> >>> Here is an image of the problem: >>> http://s1.postimg.org/bs79w4d5b/Screenshot_from_2015_10_16_22_50_23.png >>> >>> Is this a known bug? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Gilberto >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >