anyway nice idea, jonathan! thanks for this patch.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list < pd-list@lists.iem.at> wrote:
I don't know. Something like this with the guts hidden?
I didn't do the hard stuff, like handling out-of-bounds elements if the array isn't a multiple of ten-- it's just a prototype.
So, in that method you and katja are abusing, I can forward the arrayname as well as the current $0 count. Then I can open the patch and immediately send a message to the relevant $0- receiver, and the patch will populate the value table accordingly.
And then I can get rid of all the arraylistview C/GUI code that's scattered about.
-Jonathan
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 4:55 PM, Matt Barber brbrofsvl@gmail.com wrote:
A Pd patch with what in it?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:21 PM, katja katjavetter@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
Would you mind if this opened a Pd patch instead of a tk dialog?
Could be OK if the list is editable, like current array list view.
Katja
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list