Hi Krzysztof,
Am Montag, den 02. Dezember 2002 um 11:31:27 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Krzysztof Czaja:
anyway, I still do not know why not to abandon inplace tricks and use double-generator scheme instead (as marius suggests)...
It's just the cheapest way. I normally access one buffer with some 50-100 generators and a doubling of the generators would half the maximum available simultaneous voices. Your first solution with the readout of the table would work, but what is stopping the [until] object? It'd be nice, if tabread would either not output anything at all on index under- or overflow, or had a seperate second outlet to signal xflows with a bang. BTW, I think with your solution, it'd even work in place (without a third buffer), when you use a different scheme for the calculation of sample values (based on the last value at index and the goal value at index).
I'm now going to check your vex solution.
Thanks a lot, Orm