On 21/12/04 7:06 am, "martin pichlmair" pi@attacksyour.net wrote:
I just tried uninstall libquicktime0.9.2 from synaptic and it asked me to remove lots of stuff first including Gem. But, like you said, 0.9.2 should at least run. Also, 0.9.3 is out, so I presume 0.9.2 should be fairly stable. No?
i think no one tried 0.9.3 yet. i think most distros still have it in the unstable feed - thus e.g. my gentoo system would also like me to upgrade glut in case i upgrade libquicktime to unstable. didn't dare to do that.
I got 0.9.3 from apt-get;(
anyway: 0.9.2 is the real unstable version - especially jpeg support (crucial for pdp as it is the preferred codec). it inevitably crashes after some time.
but it should still let you build the object.
Pdp_qt... Couldn't create.
Any ideas?
well. looks like it did not include qt support at compile time. maybe you have one of the distros where you have to install the headers of the installed libraries separately (a la debian - i don't know much about synaptic). did the ./configure tell you that it included quicktime support? if not: install + check the headers and try to compile again.
Do you mean this?
in running ./configure, i got
. . . . checking for lqt_decode_video in -lquicktime... yes checking for glXSwapBuffers in -lGL... yes checking for SDL_Init in -lSDL... yes target is linux used configure options: --enable-mmx=no --enable-quicktime=yes --enable-v4l=yes --enable-pwc=auto --enable-sdl=yes --enable-x=yes --enable-xv=yes --enable-glx=yes --enable-gsl=yes --enable-png=yes --enable-debug=no
Thanks
CHUN