5 Apr
2006
5 Apr
'06
10 a.m.
I mean this version of JI next.
On 4/5/06, Chuckk Hubbard badmuthahubbard@gmail.com wrote:
I solved this problem in a far simpler way than I foresaw. I included in the patch two experiments I used to understand the [delay] object. In the lower one, if you disconnect the delay and make the connections directly to their destinations, there are stack overflows. This version of JInext works with no catches in all of its roles.
-Chuckk