hi joge,
indeed, Pd swallows bangs quite often, because if a class does not declare an explicit bang method, but handles lists, a bang is converted to an empty list. Thus, if bang is not expected, it is oftentimes ignored (but there are many special cases...)
I think this is not a route-specific problem, but, rather, the more general design choices would need to be made (see my post `playing hide and seek with the bangs' from 03/14/02).
interesting , i just read your post . i am sure i exactly follow it but i understand what you are generally saying .. when i can think a little bit , i will read read it . i noticed that you offered the patch for incorporation into pd , has miller added this in to pd yet ? or does he want the bang system to work how it does for some reason ...
hmmmm .. might be worth proposing a cvs system for the pd where updates can be submitted by any one in a systematic and timely manner ? not sure if this was talked about already .
btw, [route] is a synonym for [route 0].
thanks , good to know .
Krzysztof
joge .