Currently in Gem, there is not pix_frei0r,
although i have not used it, i see a [pix_frei0r] in my install. pdx 43.4 osx
so again a [pix_effectTV], would be very desirable as well
yeah some of those effects look pretty fun...
m
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Pagano, Patrick pat@digitalworlds.ufl.edu wrote:
One should be able to cycle through both freeframe and frei0r plugins without having to call it specifically Currently in Gem, there is not pix_frei0r, I would love if there was but there are over 100 plugins and there should be a number selector to select which one for example: [number 1-x] | [pix_frei0r] | [pix_film]
And the same for pix_freeframe instead of for example Having to do
[pix_freeframe bloom]
Also one of the nicest features of pidip is the porting of effectTV effects http://effectv.sourceforge.net/
so again a [pix_effectTV], would be very desirable as well
-----Original Message----- From: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:hans@at.or.at] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:09 PM To: me.grimm Cc: Pagano, Patrick; pd-list@iem.at; John Harrison Subject: managing freeframe and frei0r plugins WAS: pidip
I don't use any of this stuff, but I'm happy help make it easy to use plugins. I imagine that pix_freeframe and pix_frei0r search the standard Pd path for plugins, or if not, could be made to without too much work.
What are the particular issues there?
.hc
On 02/07/2013 01:02 PM, me.grimm wrote:
if we take into account: pix_freeframe (it would be nice/easy if when initiaized it looked in pd's standard path for a "freeframe" folder maybe?) pix_frei0r (same deal) glsl effects (i never did quite figure out an easy way to chain effects)
but other than effects that could be accomplished with these, what else?
im curious because i have only used pidip a couple of times but have always been able to find a way to do what i desired in gem... somehow.
m
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Pagano, Patrick pat@digitalworlds.ufl.edu wrote:
It has a ton of effects that Gem does not have There is not really a comparison. Gem does not compete so to speak because Gem does other things supremely well
-----Original Message----- From: pd-list-bounces@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at] On Behalf Of me.grimm Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:08 AM To: Hans-Christoph Steiner Cc: pd-list@iem.at; John Harrison Subject: Re: [PD] pidip
i would wonder. what does pidip got that gem does not? and cant those things that it got that gem does not be added to gem via original gpl code? why have more than one vid lib at least in pdx
m
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at wrote:
I'm not aware of that. Perhaps you're thinking about how pidip should all be GPL, since it is based on GPL code. The GPL does not allow more license restrictions, and the pidip license does just that. So that means that the GPL code included in pidip is still GPL, but the code that sevy contributed is under his license, and those two licenses conflict. So basically, pidip is not legal to distribute in binary form because of the conflicting licenses within itself.
Whether you choose to ignore copyright law is your decision. I am personally fine with people distributing pidip as its own thing and using it with any of my code as long as:
- the pidip distro is clearly marked as non-free
- pidip is not bundled with my GPLed code (i.e. as part of
pd-extended, pd-l2ork, etc.)
.hc
On 02/06/2013 11:44 AM, John Harrison wrote:
I thought there was an earlier version of PiDiP which was and could be included with Pd-extended because it was released under an acceptable/compatible license?
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.atwrote:
Just be aware that pidip is not free software because it has clauses in its license that restrict what it can be used for. Including pidip in your package means your package can no longer be legally distributed as binaries since the pidip license terms conflict with the GPL license terms.
.hc
On 02/06/2013 09:27 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > I just finished cleaning up both pdp and pidip libs to be fully auto-buildable > as part of pd-l2ork (including freenect, artoolkit, opencv, etc.). > There are a > number of packages you need to install from launchpad in order to > get all the > externals to build. Stay tuned for the next release coming soon > with these > enhancements... > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- ____________________ m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m. megrimm@gmail.com _________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list