19 Nov
2014
19 Nov
'14
2:27 a.m.
Hi Frank!
On 18/11/14 15:34, Frank Barknecht wrote:
The only "ugly" thing is the semi-global send/receive in $1/in and $1/out. I wonder if this couldn't be made a bit more conflict-free. I guess, I would prefer one really global receiver, that could possibly made local with a second argument (i.e. $0) that is prepended to the receiver name, as it is done in sssad.
You're right, and I will make sure to look how you did that in sssad. I am using the X/in X/out pattern too much lately and I'd be glad to have something better.
Cheers,
Chris.