Re: [PD] gemmouse wish

-- thomas ouellet fredericks, tof@danslchamp.org, montreal, canada On 6/22/07, B. Bogart ben@ekran.org wrote: > > Why not do [gemmouse 8 4] for 2:1 window? > > Of course you have to keep track of your own window size and alter the > coords in responce, but that is largely the PD way anyhow, to keep track > of what your doing yourself. > > You could just normalize from 0 to 1 and rescale based on your window > size? > > As far as I know most platforms don't even allow mouse resizing of > gemwindows... > > .b. > > marius schebella wrote: > > Hi, > > it would be very helpful to change the behaviour of gemmouse a little > > bit (to get similar results to the translation of objects in the > gemwindow). > > [gemmouse 8] should normalize to the height (like gemwin) and not to the > > width. > > given a rectangular gemwin any aspect ratio (no difference between 2:1 > > and 1:2...) always normalizes to the height and sets (with the default > > view) the top and bottom borders to +4 and -4 > > gemmouse 8 on the other hand normalizes to the width. this makes it very > > difficult (unpossible?) to build mouse interaction with variable window > > sizes. > > another feature wish: to be able to tell the dimensions of the gemwin. > > esp. after resizing by mousedrawing. > > thanks, > > marius. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >