On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Roman Haefeli wrote:
calm down. i have the impression, that you completely misunderstood matju's point. or am i misunderstanding something? i think, he meant, that for (lazy) devs it is easier to find a ('condescending') reason to not implement a certain feature than just implementing straight away.
If you browse the archive of pd-list you will find quite often mails that are basically "you want segmented patchcords just because you can't patch properly". You don't need to put quotes and parens around condescending.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada