On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 14:08 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
i can't quite follow, what you mean hear. you CAN use [wrap~] to build your own [int~] (see attached patch).
Well, the problem is, that this will give you "-1" if you apply it to [sig~ 0], whereas int(0) is 0 as is the equivalent message algorithm using [wrap] (see attached again).
ah, i see. thank you for making this clear. obviously i cannot count to 1 ;-).
sig~ 0 wrap~ print~ -> 1
as i would expect, as well. where is the bug? am i missing
something?
of course, this looks also strange in my eyes. i was not reading carefully.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de